According to a study published in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, augmented reality (AR) devices like Microsoft’s HoloLens have an important obstacle to overcome for their users – the natural mechanics in which our eyes focus on objects.
The IEEE study, conducted by researchers from the University of Pisa, explored how focal rivalry affected participants’ performance on tasks that take place within two meters of the eye. The researchers asked 20 participants to take a “connect-the-dots” test, once using their unaided vision and once using the HoloLens, where a sequence of numbered dots was visually projected using an optical see-through (OST) device mounted on participants’ heads. Computer-generated content is projected onto semi-transparent displays in front of the user’s eyes, and the user can still see real-world objects beyond the screen.
After completing the test, participants reported that their performance was similar whether they used the HoloLens or not. However, the qualitative data showed that, on average, participants made errors of 2.3 mm in length when using the HoloLens (with a maximum error of 5.9 mm), compared to errors averaging 0.9 mm during the naked eye tasks.
“Unfortunately, the users were not aware of [their] bad precision performances in AR-guided tasks,” said Marina Carbone, a researcher involved in the study. “To further evaluate this point, we are now planning to repeat the experiments acquiring the EEG during the exercise.”
As this study is reviewed and re-examined, it provides insights that AR display manufacturers like Google, Microsoft, and Lenovo should consider in their next generations of products.